Are original science meant only for the advanced rich countries?
I teach biochem and do research on soil actinomycetes and bacilli. We work in a tiny lab,smaller than a phone booth> And most of the time we face shortages of costly media,chemicals, and protocols and they are often difficult to get locally.
The worst problem is acdemic isolation and lack of institutional feedback.
Can one do creative science in such a setting or must we not try at all. Is science meant for only rich contries. Then do we leave all our resources to be exploited and patented by rich companies.
Or is there a way of doing science with alternate chemicals,media and protocols that are more affordable?
Can we, third world scientists bloom although late,just as the wonderful actinomycetes are( slow growing soil bacteria producing earthy smell od soil and antibiotics) by producing our creative 'geosmins'?
Is any third world scientist or world bank or Unesco listening?
Ciao